High-income W-2 employees and business owners often face three related challenges. They want long-term growth, protection during stock market declines, and practical tax relief. I call one strategy designed to address those goals the triple threat. It is my largest personal holding, but its reported results and tax features still require careful review.
Why I Call It the Triple Threat
I presented this investment idea at the Forbes Top Advisors Conference. Its appeal rests on three claims: strong historical returns, positive results during major stock market declines, and annual deductions against ordinary income.
- It has reportedly returned 24.8% per year since inception, exceeding the S&P 500 over that period.
- It gained 14.9% in 2022, while the S&P 500 fell about 19%.
- It has generated a tax deduction equal to roughly 30% of the invested amount each year it has been owned.
Each feature may be useful on its own. Together, they create a potentially valuable tool for investors with high ordinary income. Yet the headline numbers are only a starting point.
Investors should examine how the returns were calculated, what risks produced them, and whether the tax treatment fits their situation. Fees, liquidity limits, eligibility standards, and holding requirements also matter.
View this post on Instagram
First Threat: A Strong Historical Return
The strategy has reported an annual return of 24.8% since inception. That result has exceeded the S&P 500 during the same general period.
A return at that level deserves attention. It also deserves scrutiny. “Since inception” can cover a short or long period, and the starting date may affect the comparison. A strategy launched before favorable market conditions may look different from one tested across several economic cycles.
The comparison method matters as well. Investors should confirm whether reported performance is shown before or after management fees and other expenses. They should also ask whether distributions, tax benefits, and reinvested income are included.
The S&P 500 is a familiar benchmark, but it may not always match a specialized investment. The index represents large public companies in the United States. An alternative strategy may hold different assets, use different structures, or take risks not found in a traditional stock portfolio.
For that reason, past outperformance should not be treated as a promise. Historical returns can help evaluate a manager and process, but they cannot guarantee future results.
“It has outperformed the S&P 500 since inception, returning 24.8% per year.”
Second Threat: Diversification During Sell-Offs
The second benefit is diversification. The investment has reportedly risen each time the S&P 500 experienced a significant decline.
The 2022 calendar year provides the clearest example. The S&P 500 lost about 19%, while this strategy gained 14.9%. That difference may have helped reduce overall portfolio losses for an investor who owned both.
Diversification is not just about owning more investments. It depends on how those investments behave under similar conditions. Ten funds that own many of the same stocks may offer less protection than their number suggests.
An asset that responds differently to inflation, interest rates, or falling equity prices may improve a portfolio’s balance. Positive performance during a stock market decline can also reduce pressure to sell at the wrong time.
However, one favorable year does not establish permanent protection. Correlations can change, and an investment that held up during one downturn may react differently during another. A credit crisis, recession, inflation shock, or sudden liquidity shortage can produce very different results.
Investors should ask several questions before relying on any strategy as a defensive holding:
- What caused the positive return during past market declines?
- Could the same conditions produce losses in a future downturn?
- How often is the investment valued, and who determines that value?
- Can investors sell quickly, or are withdrawals restricted?
- Has the strategy been tested through several types of market stress?
A stable reported value may reflect genuine risk control. In some private investments, it may also reflect less frequent pricing. That distinction should be clear before an investor treats low volatility as low risk.
Third Threat: A Deduction Against Ordinary Income
The tax feature is the central attraction for many high earners. The strategy has produced a deduction equal to about 30% of the investment amount for each year of ownership, according to the figures presented.
For example, a $1 million investment could reduce taxable ordinary income by roughly $300,000 per year. That may be valuable for an executive receiving W-2 wages or an owner generating substantial business income.
This is different from simply deferring tax on investment gains. The stated benefit is a deduction that may offset income earned from a job or business, subject to the investor’s facts and applicable tax rules.
The dollar value of a deduction depends on the taxpayer’s marginal rate. A $300,000 deduction does not mean the investor receives $300,000 in cash. It means taxable income may fall by that amount.
If a taxpayer’s combined effective rate on that income were 40%, a fully usable $300,000 deduction could represent about $120,000 in tax savings. This is only an illustration. Federal and state rules, deduction limits, passive activity rules, income type, and ownership structure can alter the result.
Tax benefits may also involve future consequences. Some deductions reduce an investment’s tax basis, which can affect taxes at sale. Others may be subject to recapture or reporting requirements. Investors should know whether a benefit is permanent, deferred, or partly reversed later.
“A $1 million investment reduces the taxable income you make from your job by roughly $300,000 per year.”
No one should invest solely for a deduction. A poor investment does not become sound because it lowers a tax bill. The underlying economics, expected cash flow, risk of loss, and exit terms must make sense first.
Who May Find This Strategy Relevant
The idea is aimed mainly at high-income W-2 earners and business owners. These groups may have large tax liabilities and fewer deduction options than investors whose income comes mostly from capital gains.
A corporate executive, physician, attorney, or senior technology employee may earn most income through wages. A profitable business owner may also have substantial ordinary income. In either case, an eligible deduction could influence annual tax planning.
The strategy may be less suitable for someone who needs ready access to cash. Specialized investments can require large minimum commitments and long holding periods. They may also issue complicated tax forms or require additional work from a tax professional.
My personal ownership reflects my assessment of the opportunity. It should not replace another investor’s independent review. Portfolio size, tax status, time horizon, and loss tolerance differ from one household to another.
The Role of the Investment Manager
A highly regarded Wall Street firm manages the strategy. Manager skill, resources, and experience can influence research, execution, reporting, and risk controls.
A respected name does not remove investment risk. Investors should still review the legal entity, offering documents, audited financial statements, fee schedule, and any conflicts of interest.
Key due diligence should include the manager’s full track record, not only its best years. It should also cover losses, leverage, valuation practices, redemption limits, and the source of distributions.
Tax assumptions require separate verification. An investment manager can explain the structure, but a qualified tax professional should assess how the rules apply to each investor.
How to Evaluate the Opportunity
I would not judge this type of investment from three statistics alone. The return, defensive record, and deduction are useful screening points. A decision should follow a broader review.
- Confirm the performance period and whether results are net of all fees.
- Study the underlying assets and identify the main sources of risk.
- Review liquidity terms, including lockups, withdrawal windows, and penalties.
- Ask an independent tax adviser to test the proposed deduction.
- Measure how the position would affect the entire portfolio.
- Consider what happens if returns fall short or tax rules change.
Position size matters. Even an appealing strategy can create problems if it consumes too much of an investor’s liquid net worth. Tax savings should not leave a household short of cash for emergencies, planned purchases, or future tax payments.
The triple-threat concept brings growth, diversification, and tax planning into one discussion. Its reported 24.8% annual return, 14.9% gain during 2022, and roughly 30% annual deduction make it worth studying.
Still, attractive figures are not a substitute for due diligence. High earners should review the investment with financial, legal, and tax professionals before committing capital. The best strategy supports the investor’s full plan, not just the current year’s tax return.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Does a 30% deduction produce an equal cash refund?
No. A deduction generally lowers taxable income. Its cash value depends on the taxpayer’s federal and state rates, eligibility, and ability to use the full deduction.
Q: Does positive performance in 2022 guarantee protection in another downturn?
No. The 14.9% gain in 2022 shows how the strategy performed during one difficult year. Future declines may have different causes and results.
Q: What should investors verify before making a commitment?
They should examine net performance, fees, underlying risks, valuation methods, liquidity restrictions, tax treatment, and portfolio fit. Independent professional advice is also appropriate.
Image Credit:
