Claiming Social Security is one of retirement’s most personal financial decisions. For someone who stops working at age 62, taking benefits early may offer practical advantages. The decision involves more than securing the largest monthly check. It also involves program funding, investment returns, longevity, lifestyle, and family needs.
I am Taylor Sohns, CEO of LifeGoal Wealth Advisors, a Certified Investment Management Analyst and a Certified Financial Planner. My view is direct: if I am no longer working at 62, I expect to claim Social Security as early as possible. That choice will not suit everyone, but three reasons make it worth serious consideration.
Why Claiming Early Deserves Consideration
Social Security allows many retirees to begin receiving retirement benefits at age 62. However, claiming before full retirement age permanently reduces the monthly payment.
Full retirement age depends on a person’s birth year. For many current workers, it is 67. Benefits can also increase when a person delays them, generally until age 70.
That structure can make delaying seem like the clear financial choice. Yet the higher monthly amount is only one part of the decision. Retirees must also consider how many years they will collect benefits and what they could do with earlier payments.
The three main arguments for claiming at 62 are:
- Social Security faces a long-term funding shortfall unless Congress changes current law.
- Waiting for a larger check may require many years to produce more total income.
- Money received at 62 may offer more value because retirees can use it while they are younger and more active.
View this post on Instagram
Social Security Faces a Funding Problem
Social Security is not expected to disappear. Still, its trust funds face financial pressure. Payroll taxes collected from current workers and employers largely support benefits.
As the population ages, fewer workers support each beneficiary. Retirees are also collecting payments for longer periods. Without legislative action, projected tax income would not cover every scheduled benefit.
Social Security projections warn that benefits could fall by about 20% in the early 2030s if Congress takes no serious action. The exact year and percentage can change as economic and demographic estimates are updated.
This projected shortfall creates uncertainty. Congress could increase payroll taxes, adjust benefit formulas, raise the taxable wage limit, change retirement ages, or use several measures together. Lawmakers could also protect current retirees while applying changes to younger workers.
No one can know the final policy in advance. I do not have much confidence that Congress will act early or produce a simple solution. For some retirees, claiming at 62 may reduce the risk of waiting under assumptions that later change.
Social Security is not necessarily vanishing, but future benefits depend on policy choices that retirees cannot control.
This does not mean every eligible person should rush to file. It means legislative risk belongs in the discussion. A retirement plan should not assume that every current rule will remain untouched for decades.
The Breakeven Age Can Be Later Than Expected
Claiming at 62 produces a smaller monthly benefit than waiting until full retirement age. Delaying can still take many years to recover the payments that were skipped.
Consider a simplified comparison. One retiree claims at 62 and receives checks for several years. Another waits until full retirement age and then receives a higher amount. The second person starts behind because they collected no benefits during the waiting period.
Under common estimates, the retiree who delays may not receive more cumulative benefits until roughly age 79. The exact age depends on birth year, benefit amounts, cost-of-living adjustments, taxes, and the claiming dates being compared.
A person who dies before the breakeven point may collect less total income by waiting. Someone who lives well into their 80s or 90s may benefit from the larger lifelong payment.
Longevity is therefore central to the calculation. Health history, family life expectancy, and the need for stable late-life income should influence the decision.
Investing Early Payments Changes the Math
A retiree who does not need Social Security for daily expenses could save or invest the payments. That possibility changes a basic breakeven calculation because early checks may earn a return.
For example, assume early benefits can earn a steady 4% annual yield in a money market account or another lower-risk vehicle. The accumulated value of those payments could move the breakeven age much later, potentially past age 100 under certain assumptions.
This is an illustration, not a guaranteed outcome. Money market yields change. Investment returns may be lower, and taxes can reduce what a retiree keeps. Inflation also affects purchasing power.
A fair comparison should address several factors:
- The monthly benefit available at each claiming age
- The number of payments received before the delayed claim begins
- The return earned on saved benefits
- Federal and state taxes
- Inflation and Social Security cost-of-living adjustments
- The retiree’s expected lifespan
Investment risk matters as well. Social Security provides government-backed lifetime income and annual inflation adjustments. A private account does not duplicate those features.
Still, early payments can offer flexibility. They might remain in cash reserves, cover medical costs, reduce withdrawals from retirement accounts, or support family members. Their value is not limited to investment growth.
Money May Be More Useful at 62 Than at 92
Retirement planning often focuses on maximizing lifetime dollars. That goal can overlook how money’s usefulness changes with age.
Many people are healthier and more active in their 60s than in their 80s or 90s. They may want to travel, visit family, pursue hobbies, or improve their home. Social Security can help pay for those experiences.
Take the vacation while health and mobility still allow you to enjoy it. A larger check decades later may not create the same quality of life.
This is not an argument for careless spending. Retirees still need an emergency fund and a plan for housing, health care, and long-term support. The point is that financial value and personal value are not always identical.
A dollar spent on a meaningful trip at 62 may provide greater benefit than a dollar held until travel is no longer realistic. Retirement income should support a life, not merely produce the largest account balance at death.
Cases Where Waiting May Be Better
Claiming at 62 is not a universal answer. Delaying can be wise for people in good health, with long family histories, and enough savings to cover expenses without Social Security.
Higher earners in married couples should pay close attention to survivor benefits. The surviving spouse may receive the higher of the couple’s eligible benefits rather than both payments. Delaying the larger benefit can provide more protection for the surviving spouse.
People who continue working must also review Social Security’s earnings test. Social Security may temporarily withhold benefits if someone claims before full retirement age and earns more than the annual limit. The calculation changes after full retirement age, and withheld benefits can affect later payments.
Other reasons to wait may include:
- A need for more guaranteed income later in life
- Concern about outliving personal savings
- A desire to increase a future survivor benefit
- Continued employment and income above the earnings limit
- Limited ability or willingness to invest early payments
Taxes also require attention. Depending on total income, part of a retiree’s Social Security benefit may be taxable. Claiming early while taking retirement account withdrawals could create an inefficient tax result.
How to Make a More Informed Decision
Start by reviewing the benefit estimates in your Social Security record. Compare projected payments at 62, full retirement age, and 70.
Next, estimate living expenses and identify fixed costs. Consider how Social Security fits with pensions, retirement accounts, savings, and part-time income.
Then test more than one life expectancy. A plan should show the result if someone dies in their 70s, lives into their 80s, or reaches their 90s. Married couples should also test what happens after either spouse dies.
Finally, decide what early benefits would accomplish. If the checks would be spent without a plan, delaying may provide valuable discipline. If they would fund meaningful goals or reduce other withdrawals, claiming early may have greater merit.
My own preference is to claim as early as possible if I am not working at 62. Program uncertainty, a late breakeven age, and the chance to use the money during healthier years support that decision.
The right choice still depends on health, taxes, employment, family structure, and other income. Retirees should compare total outcomes rather than focus only on the largest monthly payment. The goal is not to win a mathematical contest. It is to build income that supports both security and a useful retirement.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Does Social Security insolvency mean benefits will disappear?
No. Payroll taxes would continue to support much of the program even if trust fund reserves were depleted. Without legislative changes, however, scheduled benefits could be meaningfully reduced.
Q: Is age 62 always the best time to start benefits?
No. Early claiming may suit a retired person who values immediate income. Delaying may be better for someone with a long expected lifespan, a younger spouse, or a strong need for larger guaranteed payments later.
Q: Can investing early Social Security payments make claiming sooner worthwhile?
It can improve the case for an early claim if the money earns a positive return. Results depend on future yields, taxes, inflation, investment risk, and lifespan, so projections should use cautious assumptions.
Image: Carolina G; kaboompics.com; Pexels
