Blog » When Should You Start Taking Social Security?

When Should You Start Taking Social Security?

retirement age individuals looking at retirement options; When Should You Start Taking Social Security?
When Should You Start Taking Social Security?; Image pexels

When you choose to claim Social Security, it can shape retirement income for decades. As CEO of LifeGoal Wealth Advisors, a CIMA, and a CFP, I use a simple decision tree to frame this choice. The goal is not to name one ideal age for everyone. It is to connect the claiming age with work, income, health, and expected longevity.

I am Taylor Sohns, a financial advisor whose firm manages more than $500 million. My suggested framework begins with four questions. Each answer can point someone toward claiming at age 62, full retirement age, or age 70.

Why Claiming Age Matters

Eligible workers may begin receiving retirement benefits at age 62. However, starting early reduces the monthly payment. The reduction usually continues for the rest of the recipient’s life.

Waiting until full retirement age allows a person to receive the benefit calculated from their earnings record. For many current workers, full retirement age is 67. It may be lower for people born in earlier years.

Delaying after full retirement age earns delayed retirement credits. These credits increase the monthly payment until age 70. Waiting after age 70 does not create additional delayed retirement credits.

This creates a basic tradeoff. Claiming early provides more years of payments. Waiting provides fewer years of payments, but each check is larger.

Social Security decisions are highly individualized, but a clear framework can make the choice easier to evaluate.

View this post on Instagram

 

Step One: Are You Still Working?

If the answer is yes, delaying a claim will often deserve serious consideration. Continued wages may cover current expenses and reduce the need for Social Security income.

Working while claiming before full retirement age may also trigger the retirement earnings test. If earnings exceed the annual limit, the Social Security Administration may temporarily withhold part of the benefit.

Those withheld benefits are not simply lost. At full retirement age, the agency adjusts the monthly payment to account for months when it withheld benefits. Even so, the rule can affect near-term cash flow.

Employment may also raise a future benefit. Social Security generally uses a worker’s highest 35 years of indexed earnings. A strong working year can replace a lower year in that calculation.

Taxes deserve attention as well. Wages and other income may cause a portion of Social Security benefits to become taxable. Claiming while earning a salary can therefore produce a different tax result than waiting.

The first branch of the decision tree is simple:

  • If still working, likely consider delaying the claim.
  • If no longer working, review other dependable income sources.

This is a starting point, not a strict rule. Someone who needs income, has major health concerns, or faces job uncertainty may reach a different conclusion.

Step Two: Do You Have Other Income?

A person who has stopped working should next review income from outside Social Security. That may include a pension, rental income, annuity payments, or planned withdrawals from savings.

If those sources cannot meet regular expenses, claiming Social Security may help close the gap. Starting benefits can reduce withdrawals from investment accounts during early retirement.

If other income can support the household, waiting may be practical. Delaying can buy a larger monthly payment later. That higher payment can be useful at advanced ages, when savings may be lower.

Separate reliable income from uncertain income. A pension payment differs from rent, which depends on occupancy and property costs. Investment withdrawals can also change with market results.

A retirement budget should account for:

  • Housing, food, transportation, and insurance costs
  • Medical expenses and possible long-term care needs
  • Pension or annuity income
  • Rental income after repairs, vacancies, and taxes
  • Withdrawals from retirement and taxable accounts
  • Emergency savings and expected major purchases

If other dependable income is unavailable, the decision tree says to consider claiming. If it is available, the next major question is expected lifespan.

Step Three: Could You Live Past Age 77?

Longevity is central to this choice because delaying requires giving up current checks for larger checks later. The longer a recipient lives, the more valuable the higher monthly payment may become.

In this simplified framework, someone who does not expect to live past 77 may consider claiming at 62. Early payments may provide more lifetime value if the recipient dies before a later claiming strategy catches up.

That does not mean age 77 is a universal break-even point. The actual result depends on the person’s benefit record, birth year, taxes, investment returns, and cost-of-living adjustments.

Health history can guide the estimate. Current medical conditions, family longevity, smoking history, and access to care may all affect expectations. No estimate will be exact.

A person should also consider the purpose of the income. Someone who needs money for basic living costs may have less freedom to delay, even with a long life expectancy.

Step Four: Could You Live Past Age 81?

If living past 77 seems likely, the next question is whether living past 81 also seems reasonable. This second threshold helps compare claiming near full retirement age with waiting until 70.

A person who does not expect to live past 81 may consider claiming at 67. That choice avoids the permanent reduction linked to claiming at 62. It also begins payments before age 70.

Someone who expects to live past 81 may consider waiting until 70. A larger monthly benefit can provide valuable protection during a long retirement.

Age 70 can be especially relevant for a household’s higher earner. A larger benefit may help the surviving spouse because survivor benefits are often tied to the deceased spouse’s payment.

Spousal and survivor rules can alter the decision. Married couples should not treat two claiming choices as isolated events. One spouse’s decision can affect household income after the first spouse dies.

The Decision Tree at a Glance

  1. Still working? Delaying is often worth considering.
  2. Not working and lacking other income? Consider claiming based on cash needs.
  3. Expecting a lifespan below 77? Age 62 may merit review.
  4. Expecting to live past 77 but not 81? Age 67 may be reasonable.
  5. Expecting to live past 81? Consider waiting until age 70.

This sequence offers direction, not a promise. The ages of 77 and 81 are useful planning markers, but they cannot settle every case.

Factors a Simple Decision Tree Cannot Capture

Social Security choices often involve more than work status and lifespan. Personal debt, taxes, marital status, and retirement account balances can change the answer.

For example, delaying Social Security may require larger withdrawals from an individual retirement account. Those withdrawals could raise taxable income. In other cases, early Social Security income might allow investments to remain untouched longer.

Inflation also matters. Social Security generally receives annual cost-of-living adjustments. A larger starting benefit means future percentage increases are applied to a larger amount.

Claiming may affect household planning after a divorce or death. Divorced spouses may qualify for benefits based on a former spouse’s record if they meet legal requirements. Widows and widowers have separate survivor benefit rules.

Medicare timing is another issue. Social Security and Medicare are related programs, but they follow different enrollment rules. Delaying Social Security does not always mean you should also delay Medicare enrollment.

Before filing, it helps to compare estimated monthly payments at several ages. The Social Security Administration provides personalized estimates based on recorded earnings.

How to Make a More Informed Choice

I recommend treating the decision tree as the first screen in a wider retirement review. Begin with cash flow, then examine health, taxes, and family needs.

Compare several claiming dates, not just ages 62 and 70. You can begin claiming in many months between those points. The best fit may be age 64, 68, or another date.

It is also wise to test more than one life expectancy. A plan might examine death at 75, 85, and 95. This shows how the choice performs across different outcomes.

No one can know an exact lifespan. The aim is to make a reasonable choice with the information available, while keeping the household’s income needs in view.

The central lesson is straightforward. Your work status determines whether you need income now. Other resources show whether delaying is affordable. Health and longevity help measure the value of a larger future payment.

Claiming at 62, 67, or 70 can each be suitable under the right conditions. Review the entire retirement plan before filing, especially if a spouse or survivor may depend on the benefit.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Is age 70 always the best time to claim Social Security?

No. Waiting until 70 provides a larger monthly benefit, but it may not suit someone with poor health, limited savings, or urgent income needs.

Q: Can I collect Social Security while continuing to work?

Yes. However, Social Security may temporarily withhold benefits before full retirement age if earnings exceed the annual limit. Benefits may also be subject to income tax.

Q: What information should I review before filing?

Review benefit estimates, monthly expenses, work plans, health, other income, taxes, and spousal or survivor needs. A personalized financial review can help compare possible claiming dates.

Image Credit: Pexels

About Due’s Editorial Process

We uphold a strict editorial policy that focuses on factual accuracy, relevance, and impartiality. Our content, created by leading finance and industry experts, is reviewed by a team of seasoned editors to ensure compliance with the highest standards in reporting and publishing.

TAGS
Investments Author
Taylor Sohns is the Co-Founder at LifeGoal Wealth Advisors. He received his MBA in Finance. He currently has his Certified Investment Management Analyst (CIMA) and a Certified Financial Planner (CFP). Taylor has spent decades on Wall Street helping create wealth. Pitch Investment Articles here: [email protected]
About Due

Due makes it easier to retire on your terms. We give you a realistic view on exactly where you’re at financially so when you retire you know how much money you’ll get each month. Get started today.

Editorial Process

The team at Due includes a network of professional money managers, technological support, money experts, and staff writers who have written in the financial arena for years — and they know what they’re talking about. 

Categories

Due Fact-Checking Standards and Processes

To ensure we’re putting out the highest content standards, we sought out the help of certified financial experts and accredited individuals to verify our advice. We also rely on them for the most up to date information and data to make sure our in-depth research has the facts right, for today… Not yesterday. Our financial expert review board allows our readers to not only trust the information they are reading but to act on it as well. Most of our authors are CFP (Certified Financial Planners) or CRPC (Chartered Retirement Planning Counselor) certified and all have college degrees. Learn more about annuities, retirement advice and take the correct steps towards financial freedom and knowing exactly where you stand today. Learn everything about our top-notch financial expert reviews below… Learn More