Close this search box.

Table of Contents

What an Ombudsman Does, Types, Pros & Cons


An ombudsman is an independent, neutral party who investigates and resolves disputes between individuals and financial institutions or other organizations. Their primary role is to find fair and equitable solutions for both parties involved. The pros include impartiality, potential cost savings, and quicker resolution, while cons may involve limited authority and dissatisfaction if the resolution is not in favor of the complainant.


The phonetics for the keyword are: What: /wət/ or /wʌt/an: /æn/Ombudsman: /ˈɒmbʊdzmən/ or /ˈɑmˌbʊdzmən/Does: /dʌz/ Types: /taɪps/Pros: /proʊz/ or /prəʊz/and: /ænd/ or /ənd/Cons: /kɒnz/ or /kɑnz/

Key Takeaways

  1. What an Ombudsman Does: An ombudsman is an independent, impartial official who investigates and addresses complaints from the public against government agencies, private organizations, or specific industries. They facilitate communication between parties, help find resolutions, and can provide recommendations for changes in policies or procedures to prevent similar issues from arising in the future.
  2. Types of Ombudsmen: There are several types of ombudsmen, including governmental, organizational, and industry-specific. Governmental ombudsmen oversee public institutions, while organizational ombudsmen serve private entities like corporations, universities, or non-profit organizations. Industry-specific ombudsmen are assigned to particular industries, such as insurance, banking, or healthcare.
  3. Pros & Cons:
    • Pros: Ombudsmen act as an impartial intermediary, often resolving issues without resorting to legal action. They provide a cost-effective and accessible means for people to voice their complaints and seek redress for grievances. An ombudsman can also highlight systemic issues within an organization or institution and recommend necessary changes.
    • Cons: Some limitations of ombudsmen include a lack of enforcement power, meaning they can only make recommendations but cannot impose sanctions or penalties. Additionally, their jurisdiction might be limited, preventing them from addressing certain types of complaints. Ombudsmen may also face challenges in remaining truly impartial due to potential biases or conflicts of interest.


The concept of an Ombudsman is important in the business/finance realm as it signifies an impartial intermediary who addresses consumers’ grievances, resolving disputes, and promoting fair practices within various industries. Understanding the role, types, pros, and cons of an Ombudsman provides insight into how individuals can seek redress when they face unfair treatment or issues with financial service providers, insurance companies, or banking institutions. This system not only protects consumers but also ensures transparency and accountability in the industry, ultimately fostering a level of trust and credibility necessary for a thriving business environment. Recognizing the significance of an Ombudsman is essential for consumers and businesses alike to collaborate and address issues in a fair and efficient manner.


An ombudsman serves as a crucial cornerstone in the financial and business world by acting as an intermediary between consumers and organizations, including government entities, universities, or corporations. The primary purpose of an ombudsman is to investigate, negotiate, and manage conflicts or complaints lodged by consumers or employees against a particular organization. By performing this mediating role, ombudspersons not only facilitate an equitable resolution for the grievances, but they also help to promote transparency, fairness, and accountability within the organization. This ultimately fosters a trusting environment, while simultaneously protecting the rights and interests of the concerned parties.

There are different types of ombudsmen, such as industry-specific financial ombudsmen who mainly deal with disputes related to banking, insurance, or mortgage services, or those appointed by educational institutions to address students’ concerns. While the advantages of having an ombudsman include impartiality and cost-effectiveness, as most services provided are free to the complainant, there are some potential drawbacks. The primary disadvantage is that an ombudsman’s recommendations are not legally binding; nonetheless, most organizations willingly comply with their decisions to uphold their public reputation and commitment to customer satisfaction. Additionally, the process might be relatively slower due to their heavy caseload or limited jurisdiction in some specific cases that warrant a more formal legal intervention. Despite these limitations, having an ombudsman in place is generally viewed as a positive step toward upholding consumer rights and ensuring a fair and ethical business environment.


An Ombudsman is an independent, neutral party who investigates and resolves complaints filed by individuals against a company, organization or government agency. They aim to ensure fairness, protect the rights of individuals, and promote transparency.

Three Real-World Examples:

1. Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) in the United Kingdom: The UK’s Financial Ombudsman Service is an example of an Ombudsman in the finance sector. FOS aims to resolve complaints between consumers and financial service providers like banks, insurance companies, and investment firms. Their role is to investigate and mediate disputes, ultimately providing a fair resolution for the parties involved.

Pros: Clients have access to a free and impartial body to handle disputes, potentially eliminating the need for expensive court proceedings. It can also reduce the strain on the judicial system.

Cons: As FOS handles a high volume of cases, its resources may be stretched, leading to delays in processing complaints. Additionally, the scope of their authority is limited, and they cannot make binding decisions if a consumer or provider declines their proposed resolution.

2. Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program (LTCOP) in the United States: In the U.S., the Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program aims to advocate for the rights of individuals living in long-term care facilities like nursing homes. They investigate and address complaints regarding quality of care, abuse, neglect, and rights violations.

Pros: Having a dedicated Ombudsman ensures that the needs and rights of vulnerable individuals such as elderly people in nursing homes are addressed. The Ombudsman can also empower people to speak out if they are facing mistreatment or poor conditions.

Cons: The LTCOP may be constrained by limited funding needed for proper oversight and advocacy efforts. The authority of the Ombudsman varies by state, which may lead to inconsistency in the services provided.

3. Insurance Ombudsman in India: The Insurance Ombudsman in India is an example of an Ombudsman within the insurance sector. They handle complaints from policyholders regarding disputes over claims, coverage, or policy-related issues with insurance providers.

Pros: The Insurance Ombudsman offers an avenue for consumers to resolve disputes in a timely and cost-effective manner. It helps to maintain trust between insurers and policyholders, fostering a better business environment in the insurance sector.

Cons: The Insurance Ombudsman is often constrained by a lack of power to enforce its rulings or recommendations. Additionally, there may be limited awareness of the Ombudsman’s services, causing some policyholders to forego their right to dispute resolution.

Frequently Asked Questions(FAQ)

What is an ombudsman?

An ombudsman is an impartial, independent individual or entity responsible for investigating and resolving disputes or complaints between customers and businesses, institutions, or organizations. Ombudsmen act as intermediaries, ensuring that both parties’ concerns are addressed fairly and transparently.

What are the different types of ombudsmen?

There are two main types of ombudsmen: public sector and private sector. Public sector ombudsmen deal with complaints against government departments, agencies, and other public organizations. Private sector ombudsmen handle disputes involving private businesses, usually in specific industries like banking, insurance, or energy.

Can anyone approach an ombudsman with a complaint?

Generally, anyone can approach an ombudsman with a complaint as long as they have tried resolving the issue with the concerned party first. The complaint must also fall within the jurisdiction of the specific ombudsman; for example, a financial dispute should be directed to a financial ombudsman.

What are the pros of using an ombudsman?

Some pros of using an ombudsman include:1. Impartiality: Ombudsmen are independent and not affiliated with any of the parties involved in the dispute. This ensures a fair and unbiased resolution.2. Expertise: Ombudsmen specialized in specific industries have expert knowledge of the best practices and regulations needed to address complaints effectively.3. Free service: For complainants, the service of an ombudsman is typically free, providing a cost-effective means of dispute resolution.4. Accessibility: Ombudsmen offer an easily accessible channel for people who have exhausted other means of resolving their complaint.

What are the cons of using an ombudsman?

Some cons of using an ombudsman include:1. Limited powers: Ombudsmen do not have the same authority as a court to impose penalties or sanctions on organizations. Their recommendations can sometimes be ignored or unenforced.2. Time-consuming: The ombudsman process can be lengthy, especially if extensive investigations are required to resolve the dispute.3. Inability to take legal action: Once an ombudsman’s decision is accepted, the complainant usually cannot pursue legal action. However, if the decision is not accepted, legal action may still be an option.

Are the decisions of an ombudsman legally binding?

Decisions made by an ombudsman are usually not legally binding, which means that parties can choose whether or not to accept the ombudsman’s recommendation. However, if both parties agree to the decision, it becomes a binding agreement that compels them to fulfill the terms laid out.

Related Finance Terms

  • Role of an Ombudsman: An ombudsman is an independent and impartial mediator responsible for addressing and investigating complaints made by individuals or businesses against organizations and public entities in the sectors of finance, telecommunications, and other industries.
  • Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS): The FOS is a specific type of ombudsman that deals with resolving disputes related to financial services, such as banking, lending, insurance, and investments.
  • Industry Ombudsman: An industry ombudsman addresses issues and resolves disputes within a specific sector, for example, telecommunications or energy.
  • Pros of Using an Ombudsman: Some advantages of using an ombudsman include their impartiality, affordability (usually provided at no or low cost to the complainant), and accessibility for both individuals and businesses to handle disputes without the need for litigation.
  • Cons of Using an Ombudsman: Some drawbacks of using an ombudsman include potential limitations in the types of disputes they can handle, longer resolution times compared to alternative dispute resolution methods, and decisions made by an ombudsman may not be binding on all parties involved, depending on the nature of the dispute and the jurisdiction.

Sources for More Information

About Our Editorial Process

At Due, we are dedicated to providing simple money and retirement advice that can make a big impact in your life. Our team closely follows market shifts and deeply understands how to build REAL wealth. All of our articles undergo thorough editing and review by financial experts, ensuring you get reliable and credible money advice.

We partner with leading publications, such as Nasdaq, The Globe and Mail, Entrepreneur, and more, to provide insights on retirement, current markets, and more.

We also host a financial glossary of over 7000 money/investing terms to help you learn more about how to take control of your finances.

View our editorial process

About Our Journalists

Our journalists are not just trusted, certified financial advisers. They are experienced and leading influencers in the financial realm, trusted by millions to provide advice about money. We handpick the best of the best, so you get advice from real experts. Our goal is to educate and inform, NOT to be a ‘stock-picker’ or ‘market-caller.’ 

Why listen to what we have to say?

While Due does not know how to predict the market in the short-term, our team of experts DOES know how you can make smart financial decisions to plan for retirement in the long-term.

View our expert review board

About Due

Due makes it easier to retire on your terms. We give you a realistic view on exactly where you’re at financially so when you retire you know how much money you’ll get each month. Get started today.

Due Fact-Checking Standards and Processes

To ensure we’re putting out the highest content standards, we sought out the help of certified financial experts and accredited individuals to verify our advice. We also rely on them for the most up to date information and data to make sure our in-depth research has the facts right, for today… Not yesterday. Our financial expert review board allows our readers to not only trust the information they are reading but to act on it as well. Most of our authors are CFP (Certified Financial Planners) or CRPC (Chartered Retirement Planning Counselor) certified and all have college degrees. Learn more about annuities, retirement advice and take the correct steps towards financial freedom and knowing exactly where you stand today. Learn everything about our top-notch financial expert reviews below… Learn More