Close this search box.

Table of Contents

Type I Error


In finance, a Type I Error, also known as a false positive, is the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis. Essentially, it occurs when an analyst incorrectly identifies a relationship or effect where none actually exists. This could lead to erroneous business decisions based off of faulty data.


The phonetics for the term “Type I Error” is: tahyp wahy er-er.

Key Takeaways

<ol> <li>Type I Error, otherwise called a “false positive,” occurs when a test falsely indicates the presence of a condition, meaning the test rejects a true null hypothesis. It’s essentially identifying an effect or difference when there isn’t one.</li> <li>The likelihood of a Type I Error can be controlled to a certain extent. This can be done using the significance level, also known as alpha. A common value for alpha is 0.05, meaning that there is a 5% chance of a Type I Error in a test.</li> <li>Understanding the consequences of a Type I Error is crucial in any study or analysis. To illustrate, in the medical field, a Type I Error may lead to unnecessary treatment interventions, bringing unnecessary costs, time, and potential risk of harm for the patient.</li></ol>


Type I Error, also known as a false positive, is an important concept in business/finance as it refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis – basically, the assumption that something is present when it actually isn’t. In terms of business decisions, this could mean implementing a strategy or policy based on an error in data analysis or interpretation, potentially leading to unnecessary costs, lost productivity, or other negative outcomes. By understanding the concept of Type I Error, businesses can better manage their decisions and reduce the risk of making incorrect conclusions from their statistical analyses and hypothesis testing, thus improving the efficiency and effectiveness of their strategies and operations.


The purpose of a Type I Error, also referred to as a “false positive” , is to indicate a potential inaccuracy that occurs in hypothesis testing. In the realm of finance and business, this error is paramount in risk management as it stands as a key indicator of discrepancies between projected and actual financial procedures or indicators. The introduction of this error into a statistical analysis can essentially prompt decision-makers to take actions based on false assumptions. Therefore, it is important in financial forecasting, innovations, and overall economic decisions to prevent potential financial missteps or financial losses.Furthermore, Type I Errors are used in financial audits to assess control risks or the possibility of fraudulent actions. They constitute an integral part of business analytics, enabling companies to analyze their financial models, make them more robust, and reduce ambiguity. By understanding the implications of Type I Errors, businesses can strive to ensure that their financial tests’ results are as accurate as possible, thus creating a more sound financial strategy. They stimulate continuous improvements on statistical models and aid in developing a refined and reliable system, enabling businesses to thrive and compete more efficiently.


Type I error, also known as a “false positive,” occurs when a tester wrongly points out something that is not really present. It refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis. Here are three real-world examples related to business and finance:1. Credit Card Fraud Detection: A credit card company may have a system in place to detect fraudulent transactions. If this system points out a particular transaction as fraudulent (rejects the null hypothesis) when it was, in fact, not fraudulent (the transaction was normal, so the null hypothesis was true), this would be a Type I error. The result is often inconvenience to the customer whose card has been blocked unnecessarily due to a false alarm.2. Loan Approvals: Suppose a bank rejects loan applications of customers if they predict that the customer will default based on their credit scoring model. If a loan application is rejected anticipating that the borrower will default (when in fact, the borrower had the ability to repay the loan), this is a Type I error. The bank makes a false positive conclusion, losing a potential good customer.3. Investing in a Startup: An investor might use a model to determine whether a startup will succeed or fail. If the model suggests not to invest in a certain startup as it projects the startup will fail (when in reality it becomes successful), this would be a Type I error. The investor falsely identified the startup as unworthy and lost an opportunity.

Frequently Asked Questions(FAQ)

What is a Type I Error in financial and business terms?

A Type I Error, in financial and business terms, is a statistical term for when a valid null hypothesis is incorrectly rejected. This is also known as a false positive.

What is the consequence of committing a Type I Error in finance?

The consequence of committing a Type I Error in finance can vary but often includes taking unwarranted action based on false results. For instance, investing resources in a product that showed false positive profit predictions.

How does a Type I Error affect business decision-making?

A Type I Error can lead to incorrect decisions due to the misinterpretation of data. Businesses might implement strategies or make investment decisions based on false positives, leading to potential financial losses.

How can I reduce the possibility of a Type I Error in a business setting?

To reduce the possibility of Type I error in business or finance, it’s crucial to apply rigorous testing standards and sample sizes. Also, carefully defining the null hypothesis and using a suitably low significance level can help.

Can a Type I Error be completely eliminated?

While methodologies can be applied to reduce Type I Error and its likelihood, it cannot be completely eliminated. There will always be a risk of making a Type I Error in statistical hypothesis testing.

What is the relationship between Type I Error and Type II Error?

These two types of errors are related but occur under different circumstances. A Type I Error refers to a false positive; rejecting a true null hypothesis whereas a Type II Error is a false negative; failing to reject a false null hypothesis. Balancing these two types of error is a key consideration in statistical testing.

How does a Type I error impact financial risk management?

In financial risk management, a Type I Error could lead to overestimating the risk associated with an investment or a business decision, thus potentially missing out on profitable opportunities or allocating resources unnecessarily.

Related Finance Terms

  • Null Hypothesis: This is a general statement or default position that there is no relationship between two measured phenomena, or no association among groups.
  • Alternative Hypothesis: It implies the existence of a particular relationship of the type to be examined.
  • Significance Level: It’s the probability of the study rejecting the null hypothesis, if the null hypothesis were true.
  • False Positive: This term is often used interchangeably with Type I error, it suggests an effect or relationship that isn’t present.
  • Statistical Power: Power is the probability that it will reject a false null hypothesis (it’s complementary to the probability of Type II error).

Sources for More Information

About Our Editorial Process

At Due, we are dedicated to providing simple money and retirement advice that can make a big impact in your life. Our team closely follows market shifts and deeply understands how to build REAL wealth. All of our articles undergo thorough editing and review by financial experts, ensuring you get reliable and credible money advice.

We partner with leading publications, such as Nasdaq, The Globe and Mail, Entrepreneur, and more, to provide insights on retirement, current markets, and more.

We also host a financial glossary of over 7000 money/investing terms to help you learn more about how to take control of your finances.

View our editorial process

About Our Journalists

Our journalists are not just trusted, certified financial advisers. They are experienced and leading influencers in the financial realm, trusted by millions to provide advice about money. We handpick the best of the best, so you get advice from real experts. Our goal is to educate and inform, NOT to be a ‘stock-picker’ or ‘market-caller.’ 

Why listen to what we have to say?

While Due does not know how to predict the market in the short-term, our team of experts DOES know how you can make smart financial decisions to plan for retirement in the long-term.

View our expert review board

About Due

Due makes it easier to retire on your terms. We give you a realistic view on exactly where you’re at financially so when you retire you know how much money you’ll get each month. Get started today.

Due Fact-Checking Standards and Processes

To ensure we’re putting out the highest content standards, we sought out the help of certified financial experts and accredited individuals to verify our advice. We also rely on them for the most up to date information and data to make sure our in-depth research has the facts right, for today… Not yesterday. Our financial expert review board allows our readers to not only trust the information they are reading but to act on it as well. Most of our authors are CFP (Certified Financial Planners) or CRPC (Chartered Retirement Planning Counselor) certified and all have college degrees. Learn more about annuities, retirement advice and take the correct steps towards financial freedom and knowing exactly where you stand today. Learn everything about our top-notch financial expert reviews below… Learn More