Search
Close this search box.

Table of Contents

Stare Decisis



Definition

Stare Decisis is a Latin term that means ‘to stand by that which is decided.’ In the context of finance and law, it refers to the principle that previous court decisions establish a precedent which influences and guides future decisions. This concept promotes stability and certainty in legal and financial matters.

Phonetic

The phonetic pronunciation of “Stare Decisis” is “stair-ee dih-sigh-sis.”

Key Takeaways

Sure, here are three major takeaways about Stare Decisis:“`html

  1. Stare Decisis is a fundamental legal principle that promotes consistency and predictability in law. It dictates that courts should follow judicial precedents established in previous legal cases.
  2. In the context of the federal courts and the Supreme Court in the United States, Stare Decisis helps maintain stability and respect for court decisions. However, the principle is not absolute and can be set aside if there are compelling reasons and circumstances.
  3. Stare Decisis is a complex doctrine with potential for controversy. Critics argue that it may lead to perpetuation of unjust or outdated laws, but proponents believe that it provides a necessary level of stability and predictability in the legal system.

“`

Importance

Stare decisis is a crucial principle in the business and finance sector as it establishes a sense of predictability and consistency in legal interpretations. The term, derived from Latin, means “to stand by things decided.” It refers to the doctrine where courts follow legal precedents set by previous decisions, acknowledging them as binding. In the context of business and finance, this principle ensures regulatory stability, fairness, and efficiency, letting businesses operate under clear, established guidelines, reducing uncertainty, and encouraging confidence in financial activities. This principle also aids in dispute resolution that might arise in transactional relations by providing standardized solutions, thus promoting uniformity in business environments.

Explanation

Stare Decisis, as a guiding principle in the legal and financial sector, provides a mechanism for stability and predictability in decision-making by the respective institutions. Understanding its purpose uncovers its function as an essential bedrock in the execution of law and finance for both contemporaries and future generations. As a principle derived from the Latin term meaning “to stand by things decided,” it requires courts to abide by, or adhere to, decided cases, demonstrating the need for maintaining consistent standards in making future decisions. Consequently, stare decisis not only connects the present with the past decisions but also charts a course for future judgments. In the world of finance and business, stare decisis plays an instrumental role by laying down precedents that shape norms, practices, and policies. For instance, once a court makes a ruling on a particular financial matter or business dispute, the decision becomes binding in similar future cases, thus ensuring fair and consistent outcomes. Beyond its role in court rulings, stare decisis, through creating a stable legal environment, helps foster a fertile ground for industries and capital markets to thrive. Investors, businesses, and creditors are therefore more likely to make confident decisions knowing that there’s an established legal direction that governs their risks, rights, and obligations.

Examples

Stare Decisis is a Latin term that means “to stand by things decided”. It is a legal principle by which judges are obliged to respect the precedence established by prior decisions. This doctrine is applied to business/finance within the context of legal decisions regarding commercial disputes, tax laws, financial regulations, etc. Here are three real-world examples:1. Marquette National Bank v. First of Omaha Corp:In this 1978 United States Supreme Court case, the court ruled that state usury laws (which limit the amount of interest that can be charged on loans) could not be enforced against nationally chartered banks based in other states. This set a legal precedent that governed similar cases, under the principle of stare decisis. Following this decision, banks began to relocate in states with more lenient usury laws and then offer credit across the country.2. South Dakota v. Wayfair Inc:The Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in this case overruled two precedents set by earlier rulings (National Bellas Hess v. Department of Revenue of Ill. and Quill Corp. v. North Dakota) that mandated a company must have a physical presence in a state for that state to require them to collect taxes. The new ruling, based on stare decisis, underlined the concept that online retailers could be obliged to collect sales taxes even in states where they have no physical presence.3. Apple Inc v. Pepper:This case from 2019 dealt with antitrust disputes over pricing on Apple’s App Store. The Supreme Court ruled that consumers purchasing apps could directly sue Apple over inflated prices, despite Apple’s assertion that only the app developers, not consumers, had the standing to sue. This decision adhered to the principle of stare decisis, reinforcing earlier rulings regarding direct purchaser’s rights in antitrust cases.

Frequently Asked Questions(FAQ)

What is Stare Decisis?

Stare Decisis is a Latin term that stands for ‘to stand by things decided.’ In law, it refers to the principle that courts should respect the precedent established by prior decisions unless there’s a strong reason not to.

How does Stare Decisis relate to finance and business?

Stare Decisis establishes a level of predictability, which can be beneficial in finance and business. For instance, court decisions involving contract disputes, corporate law, or financial regulation often set precedents that future cases will adhere to.

Why is Stare Decisis important?

Stare Decisis allows for consistency in court decisions, thus maintaining stability in the legal system. This stability can help businesses and financial institutions plan their activities according to predictable legal outcomes.

Can a court decide to not follow the principle of Stare Decisis?

Yes, a court can choose to not follow precedent if it decides that the precedents were incorrectly decided or are outdated due to societal, economic, or technological changes.

How does Stare Decisis impact financial regulations?

In finance, regulatory bodies and courts may use Stare Decisis to interpret and apply financial laws and regulations. This ensures consistent enforcement, thus creating an environment where businesses understand their legal and regulatory obligations.

What is an example of Stare Decisis in financial or business law?

An example of Stare Decisis in finance would be court decisions related to the interpretation of financial regulations. Once a high court provides a particular interpretation, lower courts will typically adhere to that interpretation moving forward.

Is the principle of Stare Decisis universal across all countries?

The principle of Stare Decisis is central to many common law jurisdictions, like the United States and United Kingdom. In civil law jurisdictions, like France or Germany, prior case law is less binding, and courts have more flexibility to interpret laws case by case.

Related Finance Terms

  • Common Law
  • Precedent
  • Jurisprudence
  • Legal Doctrine
  • Binding Precedent

Sources for More Information


About Our Editorial Process

At Due, we are dedicated to providing simple money and retirement advice that can make a big impact in your life. Our team closely follows market shifts and deeply understands how to build REAL wealth. All of our articles undergo thorough editing and review by financial experts, ensuring you get reliable and credible money advice.

We partner with leading publications, such as Nasdaq, The Globe and Mail, Entrepreneur, and more, to provide insights on retirement, current markets, and more.

We also host a financial glossary of over 7000 money/investing terms to help you learn more about how to take control of your finances.

View our editorial process

About Our Journalists

Our journalists are not just trusted, certified financial advisers. They are experienced and leading influencers in the financial realm, trusted by millions to provide advice about money. We handpick the best of the best, so you get advice from real experts. Our goal is to educate and inform, NOT to be a ‘stock-picker’ or ‘market-caller.’ 

Why listen to what we have to say?

While Due does not know how to predict the market in the short-term, our team of experts DOES know how you can make smart financial decisions to plan for retirement in the long-term.

View our expert review board

About Due

Due makes it easier to retire on your terms. We give you a realistic view on exactly where you’re at financially so when you retire you know how much money you’ll get each month. Get started today.

Due Fact-Checking Standards and Processes

To ensure we’re putting out the highest content standards, we sought out the help of certified financial experts and accredited individuals to verify our advice. We also rely on them for the most up to date information and data to make sure our in-depth research has the facts right, for today… Not yesterday. Our financial expert review board allows our readers to not only trust the information they are reading but to act on it as well. Most of our authors are CFP (Certified Financial Planners) or CRPC (Chartered Retirement Planning Counselor) certified and all have college degrees. Learn more about annuities, retirement advice and take the correct steps towards financial freedom and knowing exactly where you stand today. Learn everything about our top-notch financial expert reviews below… Learn More