Close this search box.

Table of Contents

On-Chain Governance


On-chain governance is a decentralized decision-making process in blockchain networks, where protocol changes and updates are determined through voting by its participants. Token holders, who possess the native cryptocurrency, cast their votes based on their stake in the ecosystem. This approach ensures that decisions regarding the development and evolution of the network are made democratically by those invested in its success.


The phonetic pronunciation of the keyword “On-Chain Governance” is:Ahn- Cheyn Guh-vuhr-nuhns.

Key Takeaways


  1. Decentralized decision-making: On-Chain Governance enables decentralized and transparent decision-making in blockchain networks. It allows participants, such as token or coin holders, to have a say in how the network develops, therefore reducing the reliance on single entities or developers to make crucial decisions.
  2. Efficient upgradeability: An important aspect of On-Chain Governance is its ability to efficiently implement upgrades in the blockchain protocol. Through various voting and proposal mechanisms, changes can be proposed, voted upon, and implemented without the need for hard forks, minimizing network disruptions and potential contentious debates.
  3. Incentivization structures: In order to encourage active participation in the governance process, On-Chain Governance often features incentive structures, such as staking or rewards for validators. These incentives ensure that more stakeholders engage with the process, leading to a more democratic, well-rounded, and resilient governance system.


On-Chain Governance is a crucial concept in the realm of business and finance, particularly within the context of blockchain technology and decentralized networks. This term refers to the process by which decisions are made and implemented directly through the blockchain, allowing for the transparent and democratic management of the network. Stakeholders, such as token holders or miners, can actively participate in the governance process by proposing, discussing, and voting on changes to the protocol or operational matters. The importance of On-Chain Governance lies in its ability to foster decentralized decision-making and reduce reliance on centralized entities, thus promoting the core values of blockchain technology: transparency, security, and immutability. By enabling a more equitable and efficient governance structure, On-Chain Governance has the potential to contribute significantly to the long-term success and sustainability of decentralized networks and blockchain-based projects.


On-Chain Governance is an innovative approach to managing digital assets and blockchain systems, which plays a paramount role in decision-making processes for the development and adaptation of these networks. The purpose of on-chain governance is to provide a transparent, efficient, and decentralized way of implementing changes to blockchain protocols or internal operations. It enables stakeholders, such as token holders and miners, to directly participate in decisions related to the network, thereby reducing reliance on traditional power structures, such as centralized authority figures or bureaucratic institutions. By embedding proposals, voting, and consensus mechanisms directly within the blockchain, on-chain governance strives to eliminate the potential for corruption while promoting inclusivity and collective consensus. The practical application of on-chain governance can encompass a wide range of decisions, from altering blockchain protocol parameters, such as block size or mining rewards, to establishing development funding for ecosystem growth. On-chain governance facilitates open debate, community engagement, and ultimately contributes to the acceleration of the protocol’s evolution and adaptation. Moreover, it forms a robust feedback loop that lets participants correct errors and refine performance in real-time. Through on-chain governance, an unbiased and democratized decision-making process is established, ensuring that the best interests of the entire network community are served in the development and enforcement of various proposals and operational choices. As a result, the use of on-chain governance fosters greater trust, security, and overall stability among participating parties in the ever-growing climate of digital assets and blockchain systems.


On-chain governance refers to the management and decision-making process of a blockchain network through direct participation of its stakeholders. Here are three real-world examples of on-chain governance in action: 1. Tezos: Tezos is a decentralized blockchain network that aims to offer a self-governing platform for smart contracts and decentralized applications. It implements on-chain governance through its amendment process, where stakeholders can propose, discuss, and vote on updates to the platform’s protocol. Votes are weighted by participants’ digital currency holdings and require a quorum to reach a decision. This participatory governance model has enabled Tezos to successfully incorporate necessary updates and changes to its platform. 2. Decred: Decred (Decentralized Credit) is a cryptocurrency that combines the benefits of both Bitcoin and proof-of-stake systems. It features a hybrid consensus mechanism, offering both proof-of-work and proof-of-stake elements. Decred’s on-chain governance system is carried out through its Politeia proposal system, in which stakeholders can propose and vote on changes to the network’s rules, development funding, and even software upgrades. By distributing decision-making power among all token holders, Decred allows for a more democratic and consensus-driven blockchain management. 3. MakerDAO: MakerDAO is a decentralized organization that governs the DAI stablecoin, which is pegged to the US dollar. MakerDAO employs on-chain governance through its Maker Protocol, where Maker token (MKR) holders can vote on proposals that affect the overall system. These proposals can include parameters like the stability fee, collateral requirements, and the addition of new collateral types. By allowing its stakeholders to directly participate in decision-making, MakerDAO ensures that its platform is adaptable and responsive to the needs of its users.

Frequently Asked Questions(FAQ)

What is On-Chain Governance?
On-Chain Governance is a decentralized method of managing and making decisions for a blockchain network, where the decision-making process is encoded within the blockchain protocol itself. This approach allows network participants to propose, discuss, and vote on changes directly on the blockchain, ensuring transparency, accountability, and security.
How does On-Chain Governance work?
In On-Chain Governance systems, network participants can propose changes or improvements to the blockchain protocol. These proposals are then voted on by stakeholders, typically token or coin holders. Once a proposal receives enough votes to pass, it is automatically implemented in the blockchain network through smart contracts or other mechanisms. This eliminates the need for manual intervention and enables the network to evolve continuously.
What are the benefits of On-Chain Governance?
Some benefits of On-Chain Governance include:1. Increased transparency: All proposals and decisions are public and accessible on the blockchain, creating trust among network participants.2. Decentralization: Decision-making power is distributed among stakeholders, preventing centralization of control and reducing the risk of a single point of failure.3. Faster decision making: Proposals and changes can be implemented automatically once they receive sufficient support, eliminating the need for lengthy manual processes.4. Clear rules and processes: Governance is defined by predefined protocol rules, ensuring consistency and predictability.
What are some potential drawbacks of On-Chain Governance?
Some drawbacks of On-Chain Governance include:1. Possibility of token concentration: Token holders with significant shares can have disproportionate influence over the governance process.2. Voter apathy: Some community members may not participate in voting, either due to a lack of interest, knowledge, or access to the required tools.3. Limited scope of decisions: On-Chain Governance does not address all issues and challenges a project may face. Some decisions still need to be made off-chain by the core development team or other entities.
Can you give examples of projects using On-Chain Governance?
Popular blockchain projects using On-Chain Governance include Tezos, Decred, and MakerDAO. These projects have implemented various forms of On-Chain Governance to manage their networks, enabling stakeholders to participate directly in decisions affecting their network’s future.
What is the difference between On-Chain and Off-Chain Governance?
On-Chain Governance refers to a governance model where decisions are made and enforced directly within the blockchain system, typically through voting mechanisms and smart contracts. In contrast, Off-Chain Governance relies on human intervention, discussions, and decision-making processes outside the blockchain network, such as meetings, forums, or centralized decision-making authorities.

Related Finance Terms

  • Blockchain Consensus
  • Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs)
  • Smart Contracts
  • Token Voting Systems
  • Protocol Upgrades

Sources for More Information

About Our Editorial Process

At Due, we are dedicated to providing simple money and retirement advice that can make a big impact in your life. Our team closely follows market shifts and deeply understands how to build REAL wealth. All of our articles undergo thorough editing and review by financial experts, ensuring you get reliable and credible money advice.

We partner with leading publications, such as Nasdaq, The Globe and Mail, Entrepreneur, and more, to provide insights on retirement, current markets, and more.

We also host a financial glossary of over 7000 money/investing terms to help you learn more about how to take control of your finances.

View our editorial process

About Our Journalists

Our journalists are not just trusted, certified financial advisers. They are experienced and leading influencers in the financial realm, trusted by millions to provide advice about money. We handpick the best of the best, so you get advice from real experts. Our goal is to educate and inform, NOT to be a ‘stock-picker’ or ‘market-caller.’ 

Why listen to what we have to say?

While Due does not know how to predict the market in the short-term, our team of experts DOES know how you can make smart financial decisions to plan for retirement in the long-term.

View our expert review board

About Due

Due makes it easier to retire on your terms. We give you a realistic view on exactly where you’re at financially so when you retire you know how much money you’ll get each month. Get started today.

Due Fact-Checking Standards and Processes

To ensure we’re putting out the highest content standards, we sought out the help of certified financial experts and accredited individuals to verify our advice. We also rely on them for the most up to date information and data to make sure our in-depth research has the facts right, for today… Not yesterday. Our financial expert review board allows our readers to not only trust the information they are reading but to act on it as well. Most of our authors are CFP (Certified Financial Planners) or CRPC (Chartered Retirement Planning Counselor) certified and all have college degrees. Learn more about annuities, retirement advice and take the correct steps towards financial freedom and knowing exactly where you stand today. Learn everything about our top-notch financial expert reviews below… Learn More