Close this search box.

Table of Contents

Laffer Curve


The Laffer Curve is an economic theory that illustrates the relationship between tax rates and tax revenue collected by the government. It posits that there is an optimal tax rate that maximizes revenue collection, as both extremely low and extremely high tax rates will result in reduced revenue. Named after economist Arthur Laffer, the curve serves as a visual representation of the concept of taxable income elasticity.


The phonetics of the keyword “Laffer Curve” is: /ˈlæfər ˈkɜrv/

Key Takeaways

  1. The Laffer Curve is a theoretical representation of the relationship between tax rates and tax revenue, illustrating the concept that there is an optimal tax rate that maximizes revenue.
  2. It suggests that at a certain point, increasing tax rates can lead to decreasing tax revenue, as people may have less incentive to work or may engage in tax avoidance strategies.
  3. While the Laffer Curve is a useful tool in understanding the concept of taxable capacity and has been used by policymakers to justify tax cuts or tax rate adjustments, its specific shape and the optimal tax rate are subject to debate and vary according to different economic circumstances.


The Laffer Curve is an essential concept in the realm of business and finance because it illustrates the delicate relationship between tax rates and tax revenue, demonstrating how adjusting tax rates can impact the government’s total tax collection. Conceived by economist Arthur Laffer in the 1970s, the curve postulates that there is an optimal tax rate that maximizes tax revenue, where both extremely low and high rates lead to reduced tax income. This concept has significant implications for fiscal policy, as it helps policymakers identify the optimal balance to stimulate economic growth and fund public services without overburdening the economy. The Laffer Curve remains a crucial tool in understanding taxation dynamics and guiding economic decision-making.


The Laffer Curve serves as a valuable tool for policymakers and economists to understand the relationship between tax rates and government revenue. The primary purpose of the Laffer Curve is to illustrate how tax revenues can vary based on different levels of taxation, thus assisting in determining the optimal tax rate that maximizes government revenue. This concept is particularly helpful during discussions on fiscal policy as it plays a pivotal role in shaping decisions regarding tax reductions or increases, which can significantly impact a nation’s overall economy. The Laffer Curve is used to demonstrate that there is an optimal tax rate that maximizes revenue, as tax rates at both extremes – 0% and 100% – would generate no revenue. At a 0% tax rate, the government would not collect any taxes, whereas at a 100% tax rate, taxpayers would lose the incentive to work as they would not retain any income. As tax rates increase, government revenues initially increase, but beyond a certain point, revenues decline as taxpayers seek ways to minimize their tax burdens or reduce their income. Understanding the Laffer Curve not only allows policymakers to find a balance that encourages economic growth while providing adequate funding for government programs but also serves as an essential reminder that setting tax rates is not a one-dimensional decision.


The Laffer Curve is an economic theory that suggests there is an optimal tax rate that maximizes tax revenue collected by the government. This theory, developed by supply-side economist Arthur Laffer in the 1970s, demonstrates that tax revenues could potentially decrease if tax rates become too high, as taxpayers may be discouraged from working or may seek ways to avoid taxes. Here are three real-world examples of the Laffer Curve in action: 1. The Reagan Tax Cuts (1981): When Ronald Reagan took office as President of the United States, he significantly decreased federal income tax rates in an effort to stimulate economic growth. The Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981 reduced the top marginal tax rate from 70% to 50%, and the lowest rate from 14% to 11%. Following these cuts, federal tax revenues increased over the next several years, providing support for the Laffer Curve’s assertion that lower tax rates could result in higher tax revenues. 2. The UK Income Tax Reduction (1979): Under Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, the UK government reduced the top income tax rate from 83% to 60% in 1979. The top rate was further reduced to 40% in 1988. As a result, tax revenues from high-income earners increased, demonstrating that lowering tax rates can lead to higher tax revenues. This outcome aligned with the predictions of the Laffer Curve. 3. The Swedish Tax Reforms (1990-1991): In the early 1990s, Sweden implemented a series of tax reforms. These included reducing the top marginal income tax rate from 85% to 56% and broadening the tax base by closing various loopholes. After these changes, Sweden experienced an increase in tax revenue, further supporting the Laffer Curve theory.

Frequently Asked Questions(FAQ)

What is the Laffer Curve?
The Laffer Curve is a graphical representation of the relationship between tax rates and tax revenue. It illustrates the concept of taxable income elasticity and suggests that there is an optimal tax rate that maximizes government revenue.
Who introduced the Laffer Curve, and when?
The Laffer Curve was introduced by economist Arthur Laffer in 1974. Though similar concepts existed earlier, Laffer popularized the idea during a meeting with policymakers in the United States.
What does the Laffer Curve propose?
The Laffer Curve proposes that there is a tax rate at which the government would receive maximum tax revenue. It demonstrates that at certain levels, increasing tax rates might actually result in a decrease in tax revenue due to reduced economic activity and tax evasion.
How is the Laffer Curve shaped?
The Laffer Curve is a bell-shaped curve, showing that tax revenue increases as tax rates rise initially, but then eventually decreases when tax rates become too high.
Where is the optimal tax rate on the Laffer curve?
The optimal tax rate is at the peak of the curve, typically referred to as the “revenue-maximizing tax rate,” where the government receives maximum tax revenue with minimal negative effects on the economy.
Can the Laffer Curve be used to determine exact tax rates?
No, the Laffer Curve is a theoretical concept and cannot be used to determine an exact tax rate. Instead, it should be used as a guide to understand the potential impact of tax policy changes on government revenue and economic activity.
Does the Laffer Curve apply to all types of taxes?
The Laffer Curve primarily focuses on income taxes, but the concept can be applied more broadly to other types of taxes like sales taxes and property taxes. The basic premise is that there is a point at which increasing tax rates will ultimately decrease the tax revenue collected.
Has the Laffer Curve been tested in real-life situations?
Yes, many countries have witnessed situations where tax rate changes have impacted tax revenue in a manner consistent with the Laffer Curve. However, it’s important to understand that many external factors can influence tax revenues and economic activity, so the curve should not be seen as a concrete prediction tool.
How do governments use the Laffer Curve in policy-making?
Policymakers often refer to the concepts behind the Laffer Curve when drafting tax policies. By understanding the potential impact of tax rate changes on revenues and economic activity, governments can make more informed decisions about how to adjust tax rates to achieve their goals.
Can the Laffer Curve be used to justify tax cuts?
While the Laffer Curve does show that some tax cuts can increase revenue by stimulating economic activity, it is not a blanket justification for all tax cuts. It is essential to consider the individual circumstances and assess if the given tax cut would indeed result in increased revenue or in the case where the tax rate is already less than the revenue-maximizing rate, the Laffer Curve predicts that tax cuts would decrease revenue.

Related Finance Terms

  • Supply-side Economics
  • Revenue Maximization
  • Tax Rate Optimization
  • Government Revenue
  • Fiscal Policy

Sources for More Information

About Our Editorial Process

At Due, we are dedicated to providing simple money and retirement advice that can make a big impact in your life. Our team closely follows market shifts and deeply understands how to build REAL wealth. All of our articles undergo thorough editing and review by financial experts, ensuring you get reliable and credible money advice.

We partner with leading publications, such as Nasdaq, The Globe and Mail, Entrepreneur, and more, to provide insights on retirement, current markets, and more.

We also host a financial glossary of over 7000 money/investing terms to help you learn more about how to take control of your finances.

View our editorial process

About Our Journalists

Our journalists are not just trusted, certified financial advisers. They are experienced and leading influencers in the financial realm, trusted by millions to provide advice about money. We handpick the best of the best, so you get advice from real experts. Our goal is to educate and inform, NOT to be a ‘stock-picker’ or ‘market-caller.’ 

Why listen to what we have to say?

While Due does not know how to predict the market in the short-term, our team of experts DOES know how you can make smart financial decisions to plan for retirement in the long-term.

View our expert review board

About Due

Due makes it easier to retire on your terms. We give you a realistic view on exactly where you’re at financially so when you retire you know how much money you’ll get each month. Get started today.

Due Fact-Checking Standards and Processes

To ensure we’re putting out the highest content standards, we sought out the help of certified financial experts and accredited individuals to verify our advice. We also rely on them for the most up to date information and data to make sure our in-depth research has the facts right, for today… Not yesterday. Our financial expert review board allows our readers to not only trust the information they are reading but to act on it as well. Most of our authors are CFP (Certified Financial Planners) or CRPC (Chartered Retirement Planning Counselor) certified and all have college degrees. Learn more about annuities, retirement advice and take the correct steps towards financial freedom and knowing exactly where you stand today. Learn everything about our top-notch financial expert reviews below… Learn More